Four Counterexamples in Combinatorial Algebraic Geometry
By Bernd Sturmfels. 2000
87 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Algebra and Number Theory, Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics, Geometry and Topology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ccd3150ece9d164434d1d298e1146c9b049a8f46
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Algebra and Number Theory
In Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics
In Geometry and Topology
- Aldo Conca
- Jürgen Herzog
- J. Harris
- David Eisenbud
- Huy Tài Hà
- Asia Rauf
- Steven Dale Cutkosky
- Marc Chardin
Citations in the corpus
- Regularity jumps for powers of ideals (2003, background): “haracteristic 0. But the first syzygies of a monomial ideals are independent of charK. So we may conclude that reg(I) = 3 and reg(I2) > 6 for every base field K. The third example is dueto Sturmfels [S]. It is monomial, square-free and characteristic free. It is defined by 8 square-free monomials an”
- Monomial ideals whose powers have a linear resolution (2003, unknown): “Ifthebase eld hascharacteristic 2,then I itselfhasno linearresolution.”
- Powers of Ideals and Fibers of Morphisms (2008, background): “ty of the fibers of φ over y ∈ Y , where φ−1(y) is considered as a subscheme of Pn. From an algebraic point of view, our formula is related to the theorem of Cutkosky-Herzog-Trung [1999] and Kodiyalam [2000] showing that for any homogeneous ideal I in a standard graded algebra S, regIt can be written”
- Castelnuovo-Mumford regularity of products of ideals (2002, background): “One may wonder whether the same relation holds also for the Castelnuovo-Mumford regularity, that is, whether reg(IM) ≤ reg(M) + reg(I).”