The Role of Moral Intensity and Moral Philosophy in Ethical Decision Making: A Cross-Cultural Comparison of China and the European Union

By S. Vitell, Abhijit M. Patwardhan. 2008

89 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Information Systems and Management, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/cca03841476d9071aa61106cf48cbc247cc766bf

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

1. Marco Escadas
2. Marjan S. Jalali
3. A. Musbah
4. David A. Tyfa
5. Minoo Farhangmehr
6. C. Cowton

In Information Systems and Management

1. Marco Escadas
2. Marjan S. Jalali
3. A. Musbah
4. David A. Tyfa
5. Minoo Farhangmehr
6. C. Cowton

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Marco Escadas
2. Marjan S. Jalali
3. A. Musbah
4. David A. Tyfa
5. Minoo Farhangmehr
6. C. Cowton

Citations in the corpus

• Why bad feelings predict good behaviours: The role of positive and negative anticipated emotions on consumer ethical decision making (2019, methodology): “…inten‐ tion was assessed by asking the respondents if they would act in the same manner as the consumer depicted in the scenario, con‐ sistent with Vitell and Patwardhan (2008) and Vitell, Singhapakdi, and Thomas (2001) operationalization of the construct, measured on a 7‐point Likert scale…”
• The Role of Individual Variables, Organizational Variables and Moral Intensity Dimensions in Libyan Management Accountants’ Ethical Decision Making (2016, methodology): “A number of individual variables including demographic characteristics, traits of personality and beliefs have been proposed to have a significant relationship with ethical decision-making stages (e.g. Haines and Leonard 2007; Marta et al. 2008; Shafer 2008; Vitell and Patwardhan 2008).”