Risk, Ambiguity, and the Rank-Dependence Axioms
By M. Machina. 2009
208 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, General Decision Sciences, Safety Research
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/cc428ffda113c18578dac2c03a59662195fcf381
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- Syngjoo Choi
- Shachar Kariv
- David S. Ahn
- Douglas Gale
- T. Griffiths
- Falk Lieder
- Marciano M. Siniscalchi
- Franklin Allen
In General Decision Sciences
- Syngjoo Choi
- Shachar Kariv
- Falk Lieder
- David S. Ahn
- Douglas Gale
- T. Griffiths
- Marciano M. Siniscalchi
- Dan Silverman
In Safety Research
- Syngjoo Choi
- Shachar Kariv
- Douglas Gale
- David S. Ahn
- T. Griffiths
- Falk Lieder
- Marciano M. Siniscalchi
Citations in the corpus
- Estimating Ambiguity Aversion in a Portfolio Choice Experiment (2009, methodology): “Baillon et al. (2011) show that the thought experiments proposed by Machina (2009) would also lead to violations of other theories, including MEU, -MEU, and REU, and confirm these conjectures in the laboratory.”
- Resource-rational analysis vs. resource-rational humans (2019, background): “to less optimal decisions. Expected utility theory and classical probabilities tell us what people should do if employing traditionally rational thought, but do not tell us what people do in reality (Machina, 2009). Under this principle, L&G propose an architecture for cognition that can serve a”
- Vector Expected Utility and Attitudes Toward Variation (2008, background): “Example 2 Machina [43] considers the following situation.”