Resource-rational analysis vs. resource-rational humans
By Falk Lieder, T. Griffiths. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 2019
310 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Abstract Leider and Griffiths clarify the basis for unification between mechanism-driven and solution-driven disciplines and methodologies in cognitive science. But, two outstanding issues arise for their model of resource-rationality: human brains co-process information with their environments, rather than merely adapt to them; and this is expressed in methodological differences between disciplines that complicate Leider and Griffiths’ proposed structural unification.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/687d592a02ea7fe884f7760edd494cac8a166a73
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- Andrew Kyle Lampinen
- James L. McClelland
- Felix Hill
- Stephanie C. Y. Chan
- Dharshan Kumaran
- Ishita Dasgupta
- Antonia Creswell
- Mohit Bansal
Citations in the corpus
- Language models show human-like content effects on reasoning (2022, background): “Relatedly, an influential line of work argues that ‘illogical’ human behavior is actually normative given bounded human resources (Lieder and Griffiths, 2020; Simon, 1990); but computing the utility to implement this trade-off can be impractically expensive (Horvitz et al.”