Social and political responses to ecological tax reform in Europe: an introduction to the special issue

By S. Dresner, L. Dunne, P. Clinch, C. Beuermann. 2006

170 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/cc260a968a1684b07bcf179c3fd1d01604cff833

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

Citations in the corpus

Policies for a more Dematerialized EU Economy. Theoretical Underpinnings, Political Context and Expected Feasibility (2016, background): “[84] argue that “it is notoriously difficult to get the general public to care about ( .”
A choice experiment on fuel taxation and earmarking in Norway (2011, background): “The choice of these three potential uses of the additional revenues will help us address our hypotheses regarding why earmarking increases acceptability: If hypothesis 2B is correct and people like earmarking because they distrust government and fear that non-earmarked revenue will be spent on somet”
Effectiveness, earmarking and labeling: testing the acceptability of carbon taxes with survey data (2017, background): “Acceptability is supposed to increase with earmarking and we expect earmarking for environmental purposes to have the largest impact (cf. e.g. Dresner et al. 2006; Steg et al. 2006; Kallbekken and Aasen 2010; Sælen and Kallbekken 2011).”
Public Attitudes toward Climate Science and Climate Policy in Federal Systems: Canada and the United States Compared† (2012, background): “This finding resonates with existing tax policy experience, where governments have legitimated unpopular policies such as gasoline taxes by earmarking revenues to finance road construction and maintenance, as well as with empirical studies of political acceptability in Europe (Dresner et al., 2006).”
Public Preferences for Carbon Tax Attributes (2015, background): “Public distrust in governments may be the reason why earmarking increases the public acceptability of CTs.21 After examining the attitudes of the general public about the ecological tax reform policies in Europe, Dresner et al. (2006) find that people believe environmental taxes are used only to rai”
Public acceptance for environmental taxes: Self-interest, environmental and distributional concerns (2011, background): “Dresner et al. (2006a) find that both the general public and business hold “a view of taxes solely as a means of raising revenue, rather than in terms of their incentive effects”. It seems that people to a large extent do not understand how a tax can increase welfare (see also Kallbekken et al., 200”
The acceptability of efficiency-enhancing environmental taxes, subsidies and regulation: An experimental investigation (2012, background): “, 2010, 2011), and perceptions of unfairness and coerciveness can create resistance to efficiency-enhancing taxes and regulations (Baron and Jurney, 1993; Dresner et al., 2006; Eriksson et al., 2006; Fujii et al., 2004; Kallbekken and Sælen, 2011).”
Perceived fairness and public acceptability of carbon pricing: a review of the literature (2019, background): “Impacts on poor households (fuel poverty) 14 (Baranzini et al., 2014; Baranzini and Carattini, 2017; Clinch and Dunne, 2006; Clinch et al., 2006; Dresner et al., 2006a; Dresner et al., 2006b; Harwatt et al., 2011; Kallbekken and Aasen, 2010; Kallbekken and Saelen, 2011; Kaplowitz and McCright,…”