Performance of stock assessments with misspecified age- and time-varying natural mortality

By J. Deroba, Amy M. Schueller. 2013

73 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/cbf89733c9eea9b16c020f03879d22e5d08694af

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Global and Planetary Change

1. J. Hoenig
2. A. Then
3. D. A. Hewitt
4. N. Hall
5. E. Cortés
6. Mark N. Maunder
7. K. Piner

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. J. Hoenig
2. A. Then
3. D. A. Hewitt
4. N. Hall
5. E. Cortés
6. Mark N. Maunder
7. K. Piner

Citations in the corpus

• Evaluating the predictive performance of empirical estimators of natural mortality rate using information on over 200 fish species (2015, background): “Simulation studies have indicated that the assumption of a constant M in stock assessments is still very useful even when the simulated populations are subject to age- and time-varying M dynamics (Deroba and Schueller, 2013; Johnson et al., 2015).”