Evaluating the predictive performance of empirical estimators of natural mortality rate using information on over 200 fish species

By A. Then, J. Hoenig, N. Hall, D. A. Hewitt. 2015

500 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Aquatic Science, Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f903dc784c0499dd3fb874f4502b63e6fe8b6a8e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Aquatic Science

1. Mark N. Maunder
2. K. Piner
3. E. Cortés
4. C. Simpfendorfer
5. N. Dulvy
6. N. Hammerschlag
7. A. Gallagher
8. Joseph E. Serafy

In Global and Planetary Change

1. K. Piner
2. Mark N. Maunder
3. E. Cortés

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. K. Piner
2. Mark N. Maunder
3. E. Cortés
4. C. Simpfendorfer
5. N. Dulvy
6. M. Heupel
7. N. Hammerschlag
8. A. Gallagher

Citations in the corpus

• Contemporary fisheries stock assessment: many issues still remain (2015, methodology): “Based on updating and testing indirect estimators of natural mortality using information on 201 fish species, Then et al. (2015) recommend the use of their updated maximum age-based estimator when possible and an updated von Bertalanffy K-based method otherwise.”
• Perspectives on the intrinsic rate of population growth (2016, methodology): “…invariant methods: a modified longevity-based Hoenig (1983) estimator (Then et al. 2015); a modified growth-based Pauly (1980) estimator (Then et al. 2015); two Jensen (1996) estimators based on age at maturity and k, the rate constant from the von Bertalanffy growth curve (VBGC); the…”