Technological Opportunities, Absorptive Capacities, and Innovation

By Wolfgang Becker, J. Peters. 2000

117 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/cbef58cd671f6d15e310d1065f233833c9d56638

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Non-R&D SMEs: external knowledge, absorptive capacity and product innovation (2014, unknown): “lab (Veugelers 1997; Becker and Peters 2000).”
ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY AND INNOVATION IN THE KNOWLEDGE INTENSIVE BUSINESS SERVICE SECTOR (2008, background): “…to its internal capabilities as well as its external linkages – can be expected to be of utmost importance for innovation in the KIBS sector (Cohen and Levinthal, 1989; 1990; Schmidt, 2005; for similar models, see, for example Malerba and Torrisi, 1992; Becker and Peters, 2000; Lynskey, 2004).”
Managerial ties, absorptive capacity, and innovation (2008, background): “Several proxies have been suggested in different studies: the existence of a formalized RD Veugelers, 1997); regular corporate activity in internal RD percentage of total sales devoted to personnel training ( Becker & Peters, 2000 ); percentage of RD relation to the scientific base of research under”
Exporting, R&D, and absorptive capacity in UK establishments (2008, background): “From the perspective of technological opportunities, science-based technological opportunities generally require a higher level of absorptive capacity than those generated by other sources of knowledge, such as suppliers and customers (Becker and Peters, 2000).”
Firm Level Innovation and Productivity - is There a Common Story Across Countries? (2003, unknown): “The modern literature on innovation stresses the importance of effective appropriability conditions for innovation activities (see e.g. Arrow, 1962; Spence, 1984; or Becker and Peters, 2000).”
Employment Effects of Different Innovation Activities: Microeconometric Evidence (2005, background): “…(see Cohen and Levinthal 1989), technological capabilities (see, e.g., Dosi 1997 or König and Felder 1994), absorptive capacity (see, e.g., Becker and Peters 2000), market demand (see, e.g., Crépon et al. 1998), network relationships, especially with costumers (see, e.g., Hippel 1988…”
A novel approach to national technological accumulation and absorptive capacity: aggregating Cohen and Levinthal (2002, methodology): “industry-level analysis has been undertaken (see e.g. Becker and Peters, 2000 ).”
Absorptive capacity, technological opportunity, knowledge spillovers, and innovative effort (2005, background): “There is also a diversification of the mechanisms by which such an absorption can occur Becker and Peters (2000) Two thousand and nine hundred innovative manufacturing firms (data from the Mannheim Innovation Panel [MIP] gathered in Germany in 1993) Existence of permanent R&D departments.”
The effect of external and internal factors on firms’ product innovation (2008, background): “…work of Cohen and Levinthal (1990), several researchers have analysed the effect of absorptive capacity on R&D intensity, looking for empirical evidence to support the existence of a positive correlation between these variables (Becker and Peters, 2000; Nieto and Quevedo, 2005; Veugelers, 1997).”
R&D cooperation and innovation activities of firms—evidence for the German manufacturing industry (2004, background): “These results are consistent with other findings (Becker and Peters, 2000; Henderson, Jaffe and Trajtenberg, 1998; Mansfield and Lee, 1996).”