Public Technology Procurement and Innovation

170 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Urban Competitiveness and Public Procurement for Innovation (2011, background): “Public procurement as part of innovation policy measures may take three different forms—direct, co-operative and catalytic procurement (Edler et al., 2005; Edquist and Hommen, 2000).”
Reconceptualising the 'policy mix' for innovation (2011, background): “…rationales and new typologies of innovation policies that emphasise the role of ‗indirect‘ as well as traditional 'direct' measures, ‗demand-side‘ as well as ‗supply-side‘ instruments (see e.g. Edquist et al, 2000; Soete and Corpakis, 2003; Smits and Kuhlman, 2004; Edler and Georghiou, 2007)8.”
PUBLIC PROCUREMENT AS AN INDUSTRIAL POLICY TOOL: AN OPTION FOR DEVELOPING COUNTRIES? (2010, unknown): “(See also Rothwell, 1984, Geroski, 1990; Edquist et al., 2000; Rolfstam, 2009; Uyarra & Flanagan, 2010).”
Public Procurement for Innovation as mission-oriented innovation policy (2012, background): “Until about 10 years ago this phenomenon was called “public technology procurement” (Edquist et al., 2000a).”
Public procurement, innovation and industrial policy: Rationales, roles, capabilities and implementation (2020, background): “It has also provided empirical cases of procurement-driven innovations (Edquist et al., 2000, 2015), and explored the link between public procurement and innovation outcomes (Aschhoff and Sofka, 2009; Guerzoni and Raiteri, 2015; Georghiou et al., 2014; Raiteri, 2018).”