Effects of Cognitive-Behavioral Programs for Criminal Offenders: A Systematic Review

By Mark Lipsey, Nana A. Landenberger, S. Wilson. 2007

97 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/cbb7601b23b61712c859460c4c2d2b5a1391e1fc

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. Jens Ludwig
2. Jeffrey R. Kling
3. Sendhil Mullainathan
4. Callie H. Burt
5. R. Simons
6. M. D. Cattaneo
7. Michael E. Sobel
8. Susan Athey

Citations in the corpus

• Mechanism Experiments and Policy Evaluations (2011, background): “Compared to effi cacy trials, larger-scale effectiveness trials often have more program attrition, weaker training for service providers, weaker implementation monitoring, and smaller impacts (Lipsey, Landenberger, and Wilson, 2007).”
• Pulling back the curtain on heritability studies: biosocial criminology in the postgenomic era (2014, background): “CBT also has been shown to be effective in changing cognitive and behavioral patterns of antisocial persons, including prisoners (Cullen and Jonson, 2011; Lipsey, Landenberger, and Wilson, 2007), and presumably these changes brought about by CBT are mediated by changes in the brain.”