Introducing Robustness in Multi-Objective Optimization

By Kalyanmoy Deb, Himanshu Gupta. Evolutionary Computation, 2006

508 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Computational Theory and Mathematics, Management Science and Operations Research, Statistics and Probability

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/cbb67c070b3278065908edc623036fbd8ca8f183

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Computational Theory and Mathematics

In Management Science and Operations Research

In Statistics and Probability

Citations in the corpus

Multi-objective Optimisation Using Evolutionary Algorithms: An Introduction (2011, unknown): “Some such studies in EMO are [62, 63].”
Evolutionary algorithms and other metaheuristics in water resources: Current status, research challenges and future directions (2014, methodology): “The WRM optimisation approaches where uncertainties are handled in a more explicit way have appeared relatively recently (e.g. Cui and Kuczera, 2005; Deb and Gupta, 2006; Fu and Kapelan, 2011; Gopalakrishnan et al., 2003; Kasprzyk et al., 2009; Kourakos and Mantoglou, 2008; Labadie, 2004; Mortazavi…”
On Ensuring that Intelligent Machines Are Well-Behaved (2017, methodology): “Alternatively, the user might treat the objective function and the constraint on behavior as two separate objectives, and apply a robust optimization algorithm designed for multiobjective problems [Deb and Gupta, 2006].”
A comprehensive survey on NSGA-II for multi-objective optimization and applications (2023, background): “Although robust optimization is handled in detail in single-objective optimization, there are few publications about considering robustness in multi-objective optimization (Deb and Gupta 2006), which leads to design robustness operators in NSGA-II so that the evaluation and selection is done not jus”
Multiple Criteria Decision Making, Multiattribute Utility Theory: Recent Accomplishments and What Lies Ahead (2008, background): “For examples of MCDM robustness research, see Roy (1998), Kouvelis and Sayin (2006), Deb and Gupta (2006), and Wang and Zionts (2006), along with the work on rough sets, based on Pawlak's original idea (Pawlak 1982; see also Slowinski 1992 and the discussion in §4.2).”