Management strategies for plant invasions: manipulating productivity, disturbance, and competition
By M. Huston. 2004
318 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Plant Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/cba136904f04303f2307629bf7dbdf52aa0c565c
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
- Petr Pyšek
- D. Richardson
- Jane A. Catford
- Wilfried Thuiller
- Mathieu Rouget
- Guy F. Midgley
- A. Ricciardi
- Chaeho Byun
In Nature and Landscape Conservation
- Petr Pyšek
- D. Richardson
- Wilfried Thuiller
- Jane A. Catford
- Guy F. Midgley
- Mathieu Rouget
- A. Ricciardi
- Lluís Brotons
In Plant Science
- Petr Pyšek
- D. Richardson
- Jane A. Catford
- Wilfried Thuiller
- A. Ricciardi
- Peter Vesk
- Thomas J. Stohlgren
- B. von Holle
Citations in the corpus
- Ecological correlates of invasion by Arundo donax in three southern California riparian habitats (2008, background): “Nitrogen availability has been implicated in invasibility by many authors (Stohlgren et al. 1999; Fenn et al. 2003; Huston 2004; Blumenthal 2006), but this represents only one environmental variable that influences invasions.”
- Progress toward understanding the ecological impacts of nonnative species (2013, background): “Huston (2004) adapted this theory to address plant invasions and predicted that, although we might expect a higher probability of establishment in either unproductive/undisturbed environments or disturbed/ productive environments, the highest impacts from nonnative species should be in systems with…”
- Invasive Exotic Plants in the Tropical Pacific Islands: Patterns of Diversity (2009, background): “…species diversity suggests not only that areas and habitats rich in native species may be especially vulnerable (Jarnevich et al. 2006), but also that productivity and disturbance, which affect native diversity, might also be manipulated to manage invasive species (Huston 2004, Denslow 2007).”
- Establishment of non-native plant species after wildfires: effects of fuel treatments, abiotic and biotic factors, and post-fire grass seeding treatments. (2006, background): “Some have suggested that plant dominance is the underlying driver of this relationship, with plant diversity (native and exotic) decreasing when a dominant species is present and has high productivity (Huston 2004; Smith et al. 2004).”
- The application of predictive modelling of species distribution to biodiversity conservation (2007, background): “…the negative consequences of biological invaders on native taxa (Crawley, 1986, 1987; D’Antonio & Vitousek, 1992; Crawley et al ., 1996; Mack, 1996; Veltman et al ., 1996; Williamson & Fitter, 1996; Williamson, 1999; Mack et al ., 2000; Huston, 2004; Richardson, 2004; Callaway & Maron, 2006).”
- Predicting the number of ecologically harmful exotic species in an aquatic system (2007, background): “…in the recipient region is regulated by extrinsic factors, e.g. resource availability, habitat structure, disturbance, or the diversity, composition and evolutionary naïveté of the recipient community (Byers, 2002a,b; Ricciardi, 2003; Huston, 2004; Ricciardi & Atkinson, 2004; Ruesink, 2007).”
- THE THREE PHASES OF LAND‐USE CHANGE: IMPLICATIONS FOR BIODIVERSITY (2005, background): “These plant communities tend to be easily invaded by exotic species (Huston 1994, 2004), and the introduction of exotic predator species such as dogs, cats, and foxes can have a devastating effect on native vertebrates (Abbott 2001, Hansen et al. 2005).”
- Plant invasions: merging the concepts of species invasiveness and community invasibility (2006, background): “Among the various attempts at unifying the many factors potentially influencing invasibility we find four particularly useful: Alpert et al. (2000), Davis et al. (2000), D’Antonio et al. (2001) and Huston (2004).”
- Hotspots of plant invasion predicted by propagule pressure and ecosystem characteristics (2011, background): “, 2000) – was represented by interactions among disturbance, resource levels and vegetation cover (Huston, 2004).”
- Niche‐based modelling as a tool for predicting the risk of alien plant invasions at a global scale (2005, background): “However, other factors need to be included in models at a finer geographical scale to predict the distribution of invasive aliens, among which propagule pressure and disturbance are of major importance (Rouget & Richardson, 2003; Huston, 2004).”
- Species richness of alien plants in South Africa: Environmental correlates and the relationship with indigenous plant species richness (2005, background): “…appropriate to show the marked influence of human-mediated disturbance and other factors such as propagule pressure that become increasingly important as determinants of invasibility at finer spatial scales (Rouget et al., 2002; Rouget & Richardson, 2003a,b; Foxcroft et al., 2004; Huston, 2004).”
- Distribution of non-native invasive species and soil properties in proximity to paved roads and unpaved roads in a quartzitic mountainous grassland of southeastern Brazil (rupestrian fields) (2010, background): “Contrasting with the traditional approach to understanding invasions, an alternative approach is to focus on the physical environmental conditions that affect invasive species fitness, which are the same for native species (e.g., Huston 1979, 2004 ).”
- Reducing redundancy in invasion ecology by integrating hypotheses into a single theoretical framework (2009, background): “Episodic disturbance can increase resource availability and it has long been associated with invasion (Elton, 1958; Rejmánek & Richardson, 1996; Davis & Pelsor, 2001; though not always, Sher & Hyatt, 1999; Huston, 2004; Buckley et al., 2007).”
- Links between estuarine condition and spatial distributions of marine invaders (2009, result): “Numbers of nonindigenous and native species were strongly positively correlated with each other, which agree with findings from other large-scale experimental studies of invasion (Lonsdale, 1999; Stohlgren et al., 1999; Levine, 2000; Stohlgren et al., 2003; Huston, 2004; Davis et al., 2000).”
- Elton, C.S. 1958: The ecology of invasions by animals and plants. London: Methuen (2007, background): “Recent work points to a complex relationship between disturbance and invasibility (Davis et al., 2000); certainly, Elton’s one-dimensional notion that only highly disturbed ecosystems are invaded is too simplistic (Huston, 2004).”