THE THREE PHASES OF LAND‐USE CHANGE: IMPLICATIONS FOR BIODIVERSITY

By M. Huston. 2005

145 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Global and Planetary Change

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/30991051ee90d6e932bd4c06a2f652980a5c4966

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. Erle C. Ellis
2. Ruth S. DeFries
3. Andrew J. Hansen
4. Steve Wolverton

In Global and Planetary Change

1. Erle C. Ellis
2. Ruth S. DeFries
3. Andrew J. Hansen
4. Steve Wolverton
5. M. Huston

Citations in the corpus

• Biodiversity response to intensive biomass production from forest thinning in North American forests – A meta-analysis (2011, background): “Much of this land is privately owned and is under increasing ressure from rural residential development (Huston, 2005; Gude t al., 2006).”
• Ecological mechanisms linking protected areas to surrounding lands. (2007, background): “Intense human land use, in contrast, is often centered on more equitable and productive landscape settings (Seabloom et al. 2002, Huston 2005).”
• Regulation of animal size by eNPP, Bergmann's rule, and related phenomena (2011, background): “The implications of such research extend from animal biology and wildlife management to human health, social justice, and economic development (Steckel 1983, 2000, Huston 1993, 1994, 2005, Leon and Walt 2000).”
• Ecology in an anthropogenic biosphere (2015, background): “For most societies in most biomes, flatter areas with accessible water tend to be the most suitable (Silbernagel et al. 1997, Huston 2005), but this can differ greatly across societies and biomes.”