A further comment on the construct validity of laboratory aggression paradigms: A response to giancola and chermack

By J. Tedeschi, B. Quigley. 2000

91 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/cb62d9f36c9826172fc219434f1107ba2452fce9

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

1. J. Archer
2. C. Ferguson
3. Amy M. Cohn
4. A. Zeichner

In Social Psychology

1. Amy M. Cohn
2. A. Zeichner
3. C. Ferguson
4. J. Archer
5. Sarah M. Coyne
6. Andrea Campbell
7. S. M. Rueda
8. Tobias Greitemeyer

In Sociology and Political Science

1. J. Archer
2. C. Ferguson
3. Amy M. Cohn
4. A. Zeichner
5. S. M. Rueda
6. Tobias Greitemeyer
7. Dirk O. Mügge
8. Sarah M. Coyne

Citations in the corpus

• Sex Differences in Aggression in Real-World Settings: A Meta-Analytic Review (2004, background): “There is continuing contro- versy over the usefulness of such measures of aggression (e.g., Giancola & Zeichner, 1995; Tedeschi & Quigley, 1996, 2000).”
• Blazing Angels or Resident Evil? Can Violent Video Games be a Force for Good? (2010, background): “…many measures used in video game studies claiming to represent “aggression” in fact don’t correlate well with actual real-life aggressive acts or violent behaviors (Ferguson & Rueda, 2009; Ferguson, Smith, Miller-Stratton, Fritz, & Heinrich, 2008; Ritter & Eslea, 2005; Tedeschi & Quigley, 2000).”
• Effects of masculine identity and gender role stress on aggression in men. (2006, methodology): “The present procedure should allay some of the concerns raised by previous researchers as to the construct validity of the paradigm (Tedeschi & Quigley, 2000).”