The Effect of Honesty and Superior Authority on Budget Proposals

By Frederick W. Rankin, Steven T. Schwartz, Richard A. Young. 2008

223 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Management Information Systems, Safety Research

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/cb421bac8180e68d44daa9dd9b649583545aadc0

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

1. J. Leiby
2. A. M. Farrell
3. Jonathan H. Grenier

In Management Information Systems

1. J. Leiby
2. A. M. Farrell
3. Jonathan H. Grenier

In Safety Research

1. J. Leiby
2. A. M. Farrell
3. Jonathan H. Grenier

Citations in the corpus

• Scoundrels or Stars? Theory and Evidence on the Quality of Workers in Online Labor Markets (2017, methodology): “(2001), which has been used in similar studies of honesty (e.g., Hannan et al. 2006; Rankin et al. 2008).”
• Determinants of Moral Judgments Regarding Budgetary Slack: An Experimental Examination of Pay Scheme and Personal Values (2011, unknown): “American Accounting Association framing effects Rankin et al. 2008; Schatzberg and Stevens 2008 .”
• Fifty-Year Overview of Judgment and Decision-Making Research in Accounting (2011, unknown): “Rankin et al. (2008) also found that when subordinates were required to make a factual assertion about the budget and had final authorisation over it, the situation was framed as an ethical dilemma, resulting in a greater honesty.”