Phylogenetic community structure and phylogenetic turnover across space and edaphic gradients in western Amazonian tree communities

By P. Fine, Steven W. Kembel. 2011

313 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/cb35b438bb65243622fdb5d282f5f95c4a276185

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

Citations in the corpus

Rhizosphere-associated bacterial network structure and spatial distribution differ significantly from bulk soil in wheat crop fields (2017, result): “Clustering of quality sequences into operational taxonomic units (OTUs) was performed with UCLUST based on a 97% similarity level (Edgar, 2010).”
Rethinking Community Assembly through the Lens of Coexistence Theory (2012, background): “…studies provide evidence of both clustering (Webb 2000, Cavender-Bares et al. 2004a, Kembel & Hubbell 2006, Kraft & Ackerly 2010, Anderson et al. 2011, Fine & Kembel 2011) and overdispersion (Kembel & Hubbell 2006, Slingsby & Verboom 2006, Swenson et al. 2007, Letcher 2010, Anderson et al. 2011).”
Estimating and mapping ecological processes influencing microbial community assembly (2015, methodology): “To quantify phylogenetic turnover between communities we used the between-community mean-nearest-taxon-distance (βMNTD) metric (Fine and Kembel, 2011; Webb et al., 2011), which quantifies the phylogenetic distance between each species in one community (k) and its closest relative in a second…”
Using functional traits and phylogenetic trees to examine the assembly of tropical tree communities (2012, background): “Environmentalfil- teringmaybeparticularly strongwhenexamining local commu- nities differing in topographic position (Kraft, Valencia & Ackerly 2008) or across strong edaphic or climatic gradients (Cavender-Bares, Keen & Miles 2006; Fine & Kembel 2011).”
Soil pH and biome are both key determinants of soil archaeal community structure (2015, methodology): “betaMNTD) was computed as the number of standard deviations that observed betaMNTD departed from the mean of null distribution (999 null iterations) based on random shuffling of OTU labels across the tips of the phylogeny (Fine and Kembel, 2011; Stegen et al., 2012; Wang et al., 2013).”
Soil pH mediates the balance between stochastic and deterministic assembly of bacteria (2018, methodology): “nities was calculated as the mean nearest taxon distance metric (from here on we refer to this as βMNTD [2, 45] using “comdistnt” function (abundance.”
Phylogenetic turnover in tropical tree communities: impact of environmental filtering, biogeography and mesoclimatic niche conservatism (2012, background): “In Amazonian forest tree communities, Fine & Kembel (2011) reported that species turnover as well as phylogenetic turnover correlate both with spatial distance and edaphic gradient but they did not use partial Mantel tests to check whether phylogenetic turnover still correlates with spatial…”
Phylogenetic diversity of Amazonian tree communities (2015, methodology): “MPD may not be the most useful metrics of phylogenetic diversity for conservation prioritization.”
Dispersal-Based Microbial Community Assembly Decreases Biogeochemical Function (2017, methodology): “This was done by calculating the abundance-weighted β-mean-nearest-taxon-distance (βMNTD) [35,36].”
Consistent patterns of elevational change in tree taxonomic and phylogenetic diversity across Malesian mountain forests (2013, background): “This is in accordance with the calibration used by Davies et al. (2004) and is compatible with other phylogenetic community studies (e.g. Kembel & Hubbell, 2006; Slik et al., 2009; Fine & Kembel, 2011).”