Can the Design of Community-Driven Development Reduce the Risk of Elite Capture? Evidence from Indonesia

201 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Experiences of host communities with carbon market projects: towards multi-level climate justice (2014, background): “Community-driven development projects often do incorporate principles of ‘good governance’ advocating the equitable distribution of benefits accruing from these projects (Fritzen, 2007).”
The empty rhetoric of poverty reduction at the base of the pyramid (2012, background): “In some cases, ‘benevolent’ elite control rather than ‘pernicious’ elite capture may be observed (see Dasgupta and Beard, 2007; and Fritzen, 2007 for evidence from Indonesia).”
Corruption, investments and contributions to public goods: Experimental evidence from rural Liberia (2014, background): “5 See Fritzen (2007) and Khwaja (2009) on leadership and project design in Indonesia”
The role of fairness and benefit distribution in community-based Payment for Environmental Services interventions: A case study from Menabe, Madagascar☆ (2010, background): “Benefit capture by the elite (Kellert et al., 2000; Thompson and Homewood, 2002; Balint and Mashinya, 2006; Fritzen, 2007), variable opportunity and transaction costs among individuals and communities resulting in the perception of unfair distribution (Kumar, 2002; Adhikari, 2005; Meshack et al.”