The role of fairness and benefit distribution in community-based Payment for Environmental Services interventions: A case study from Menabe, Madagascar☆

By Matthew Sommerville, Julia P. G. Jones, Michael Rahajaharison, E. Milner‐Gulland. 2010

276 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Global and Planetary Change

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b3171c067eb7b88c1d37a0fdf424170fcc687de8

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In General Agricultural and Biological Sciences

In Global and Planetary Change

Citations in the corpus

Incentives, conditionality and collective action in payment for environmental services (2014, background): “If government managed such an arrangement questions might arise regarding why those benefits should be conditional on environmental service delivery (Sommerville et al. 2010).”
Payments for biodiversity conservation in the context of weak institutions:Comparison of three programs from Cambodia? (2010, unknown): “In Madagascar, a villagemanaged program was perceived to be fair by the majority of participants, despite apparent inequalities, and communal benefits were ranked highly (Sommerville et al., 2010-this issue).”
Can REDD+ social safeguards reach the ‘right’ people? Lessons from Madagascar (2016, background): “…a common problem identified in conservation and development projects (Crook, 2003; Olowu, 2003; Platteau and Gaspart, 2003; Pollini et al., 2014; Sommerville et al., 2010), as well as of systematic bias in the assessment process favouring more accessible households and communities, similar to…”
Payments for ecosystem services as commodity fetishism (2010, background): “This diversity also influences participant and non-participants' responses to PES and the outcomes of these schemes (Vatn, 2010-this issue; Fisher et al., 2010-this issue; Sommerville et al., 2010-this issue).”
Efficiency of Payments for Environmental Services: Equity and additionality in a case study from a Biosphere Reserve in Chiapas, Mexico (2011, background): “In practical terms, PES has unfolded as a broader concept applied to a variety of situations (Farley and Constanza, 2010; Sommerville et al., 2010).”
Market instruments, ecosystem services, and property rights: Assumptions and conditions for sustained social and ecological benefits (2013, background): “…depends both on the ability of administering gencies to direct payments to the appropriate resource users (that s, to those capable of providing or undermining the required serices) (Vatn, 2010) and on the perceived fairness of these payments Pascual et al., 2010; Sommerville et al., 2010).”