Asteroid Impacts: Laboratory Experiments and Scaling Laws

By K. Holsapple, I. Giblin, K. Housen, A. Nakamura, E. Ryan. 2002

135 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/cb258dd4a11ea28a85b235e6e5b9aa57fe3072b6

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Gravitational Aggregates: Evidence and Evolution (2002, background): “5 of Holsapple et al., 2002, for a graphical comparison of analytical, experimental, and simulation results — estimates of the transition from the strength regime to the gravity regime vary from D ~100 m to ~10 km).”
The fossilized size distribution of the main asteroid belt (2003, methodology): “, such that one-half the mass of the target body escapes) (Durda et al., 1998; Holsapple et al., 2002; Asphaug et al., 2002).”
Size-frequency distributions of fragments from SPH/N-body simulations of asteroid impacts: Comparison with observed asteroid families (2007, methodology): “Recent reviews of asteroid collisional disruption, including observations, experimental scaling, and computational modeling, are found in Ryan (2000), Holsapple et al. (2002), and Asphaug et al. (2002).”
Fragment properties at the catastrophic disruption threshold: The effect of the parent body’s internal structure (2009, methodology): “Other material properties will be investigated in the future to determine whether our results can be generalized.”
Asteroid Density, Porosity, and Structure (2002, background): “On the other hand, the impactor conditions required to shatter or disperse an asteroid are much more uncertain (Holsapple et al., 2002).”
Nature and Origins of Meteoritic Breccias (2006, background): “We remain woefully ignorant about the diverse effects of impacts between asteroids spanning many orders of magnitude in size (Holsapple et al., 2002), and we have yet to understand fundamental questions such as the impact rate in the primordial asteroid belt and the excitation process that changed…”
THE IMPORTANCE OF SECONDARY CRATERING TO AGE CONSTRAINTS ON PLANETARY SURFACES (2006, background): “High-porosity targets produce little ejecta in vertical impacts, as such craters likely form primarily by compaction (Holsapple et al. 2002), although Yamamoto (2002) and Yamamoto et al. (2005) found that oblique impacts into powders generate greater volumes of high-velocity ejecta.”