Size-frequency distributions of fragments from SPH/N-body simulations of asteroid impacts: Comparison with observed asteroid families

By D. Durda, William Bottke, D. Nesvorný, B. Enke, W. Merline, E. Asphaug, Derek C. Richardson. 2007

194 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Atmospheric Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/372e6ccd01f63b12a9432e2968a6a44e1d98feed

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

In Atmospheric Science

Citations in the corpus

In search of the source of asteroid (101955) Bennu: Applications of the stochastic YORP model (2015, methodology): “The parent body size, estimated using the techniques of Durda et al. (2007), was approximately D 100–160 km.”
MAIN BELT ASTEROIDS WITH WISE/NEOWISE. I. PRELIMINARY ALBEDOS AND DIAMETERS (2011, background): “The SFD of asteroid family members can also act as a tracer of the physical properties of the original parent body and can even be used to constrain the impact velocity and angle (Durda et al. 2007).”
Identification and Dynamical Properties of Asteroid Families (2015, unknown): “Finally, the uncertainty in the membership of the largest fam- 8 ily members critically affects our estimates of size of the disrupted parent bodies (e.g., Durda et al., 2007).”
COLLISIONS BETWEEN GRAVITY-DOMINATED BODIES. I. OUTCOME REGIMES AND SCALING LAWS (2011, result): “…results of subsonic and supersonic collisions from previous work (Leinhardt & Stewart 2009; Agnor & Asphaug 2004a,b; Marcus et al. 2009, 2010b; Durda et al. 2004, 2007; Jutzi et al. 2010; Benz & Asphaug 1999; Benz 2000; Stewart & Leinhardt 2009; Korycansky & Asphaug 2009; Nesvorný et al.…”
Fragment properties at the catastrophic disruption threshold: The effect of the parent body’s internal structure (2009, background): “2001, 2002, Durda et al. 2007). Moreover, Michel et al. (2003) found that the size distribution of pre-shattered non-porous targets tends to be more continuous than those of monolithic non-porous targets, for all considered target diameters.”
The Size Distributions of Asteroid Families in the SDSS Moving Object Catalog 4 (2008, methodology): “…families encode information about their formation and evolution, and constrain the properties of the families’ parent bodies (e.g., Marzari, Farinella & Davis 1999; Tanga et al. 1999; Campo Bagatin & Petit 2001; Michel et al. 2002; de Elia & Brunini 2007; Durda et al. 2007; and references therein).”
Rubble Pile Asteroids (2018, background): “Therefore most efforts include a handoff from hydrodynamics to Nbody gravity particle codes (Michel et al. 2001,2002,2003,2004, Durda et al. 2004, 2007, Benavidez et al. 2015).”