New Firm Growth: Exploring Processes and Paths

By Elizabeth Garnsey, E. Stam, P. Heffernan. 2006

401 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Economics and Econometrics, Management of Technology and Innovation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/cb0b5aca43fbb3c4b43fc4ad40a8b00c28cb354b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

In Economics and Econometrics

In Management of Technology and Innovation

Citations in the corpus

Contribution of Resource-Based View and Entrepreneurial Orientation on Small Firm Growth (2011, background): “According to Garnsey et al. (2006) the advantages of early growth are internal (learning effects) and well as external (market position).”
What happens to gazelles? The importance of dynamic management strategy (2010, background): “Few appear to grow in a consistent linear manner (Delmar et al. 2003; Garnsey et al. 2006 ).”
The cost of growth: small firms and the pricing of bank loans (2015, neutral): “Small firms may take a variety of paths to growth (Garnsey et al. 2006).”
Why Butterflies Don’t Leave: Locational Behavior of Entrepreneurial Firms (2007, background): “Although the various phases are presented in a specific sequence, this does not imply that they necessarily occur in the sequence in which they are presented (see Garnsey, Stam, and Heffernan 2006).”
Factors distinguishing small firm growers and non-growers (2011, background): “…one that accords with Levie and Lichtenstein’s (2010) proposal of a dynamic state model of changes in firm size, but further work is needed to reconcile the ability of owner-managers to control growth and the erratic nature of small firm growth paths (Garnsey et al., 2006; Olson et al., 2008).”
Advancing Firm Growth Research: A Focus on Growth Mode Instead of Growth Rate (2010, background): “This may be one reason why firm growth tends to not be more erratic than linear (Garnsey et al., 2006).”
Inside the high-tech black box: A critique of technology entrepreneurship policy (2014, background): “As the literature suggests (Garnsey et al., 2006; Mohr and Garnsey, 2011), the growth process of these TBFs was highly discontinuous and non-linear.”
Like milk or wine: Does firm performance improve with age? (2013, background): “However, this result contrasts with previous work emphasizing the prevalence of growth setbacks for young firms (Garnsey et al., 2006) and so we view our results for very young firms with a little caution.17 16 We investigated the autocorrelation of employment growth, but since many (small) firms…”
A Terminal Assessment of Stages Theory: Introducing a Dynamic States Approach to Entrepreneurship (2010, neutral): “Garnsey, Stam, and Heffernan (2006) also examined the growth of high-tech ventures (n = 93) over a 10-year period and found that less than one third of them followed growth paths that could in any way reflect the paths predicted by a life cycle model.”