Invasive species profiling? Exploring the characteristics of non-native fishes across invasion stages in California

By Michael P. Marchetti, Peter B. Moyle, Richard A. Levine. 2004

284 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/caf5c74053f56674846218a396d0b180f07a9df8

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

Citations in the corpus

Predicting invasiveness of species in trade: climate match, trophic guild and fecundity influence establishment and impact of non‐native freshwater fishes (2016, background): “For example, temperature tolerance (Kolar & Lodge, 2002; Bomford et al., 2010), trophic status (Marchetti et al., 2004b; Ruesink, 2005), spawning habitat requirements (Mandrak, 1989; Olden et al., 2006) and history of invasion outside the native range (Kolar & Lodge, 2002; Ribeiro et al., 2008)…”
Life-history traits of non-native fishes in Iberian watersheds across several invasion stages: a first approach (2007, methodology): “The ten species variables of Marchetti et al. (2004c) were adopted for analysis: trophic status of adults, size of the species’ native range, degree of parental care, maximum fecundity, maximum adult size, maximum lifespan, physiological tolerance, distance from nearest native source, prior invasi”
Advancing impact prediction and hypothesis testing in invasion ecology using a comparative functional response approach (2014, background): “…trait comparisons is patchy among animal taxa (Hayes and Barry 2008), with some good predictors of invasion success for birds (Sol et al. 2002; Blackburn et al. 2009), fishes (Marchetti et al. 2004a, b) and mammals (Jeschke and Strayer 2006), often based on propagule pressure and human affiliation.”
Crying wolf, crying foul, or crying shame: alien salmonids and a biodiversity crisis in the southern cool-temperate galaxioid fishes? (2006, background): “What is it that renders invasive species so damaging and receiving ecosystems so vulnerable? The impacts of invasive species on indigenous biotas, and especially the role of humancaused invasions in causing biodiversity loss, have become a major issue for conservation ecology, globally, and there is”
Determinants of vertebrate invasion success in Europe and North America (2006, methodology): “We had three variables on body size, adult body mass and length (Cassey, 2002; Roy et al., 2002; Cassey et al., 2004b, c; Forsyth et al., 2004; Marchetti et al., 2004; Alcaraz et al., 2005, Ruesink, 2005; Vila-Gispert et al., 2005; reviewed by Ehrlich, 1989; Kolar & Lodge, 2001; Fisher & Owens,…”
Invasion of stream fishes into low trophic positions (2007, background): “…interactions; diet K. B. Gido, Division of Biology, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506, USA; e-mail: kgido@ksu.edu Accepted for publication January 17, 2007 basis for predicting the success of fish invaders from different trophic levels (Moyle & Light 1996; Marchetti et al. 2004a,b).”
Predator-prey naïveté, antipredator behavior, and the ecology of predator invasions (2010, background): “…community is important is a special case of the general idea that invasion success depends on traits of the potential invader and how those traits might allow the invader to cope with challenges in the invaded community (Lodge 1993, Duncan et al. 2001, Marchetti et al. 2004, Rehage et al. 2005).”
Predicting establishment success for introduced freshwater fishes: a role for climate matching (2010, background): “It is probable that propagule pressure plays a role in determining establishment success (Marchetti et al. 2004; Colautti 2005; Duggan et al. 2006; Hayes and Barry 2008).”
Profiling invasive fish species: the importance of phylogeny and human use (2005, background): “Invasive species with a wide distribution are likely to succeed in a new environment because of their wide environmental tolerances (Goodwin et al., 1999; Marchetti et al., 2004).”
Predicting Invasion Success: Freshwater Fishes in California as a Model (2006, methodology): “…a contributor to some multivariate models predicting invasion success, suggesting that widely distributed species are somewhat more likely to have other features favoring invasion success than those with narrow distributions (Marchetti et al. 2004c), a conclusion supported weakly by Ruesink (2005).”
Heads you win, tails you lose: Life‐history traits predict invasion and extinction risk of the world's freshwater fishes (2017, background): “This may simply reflect the fact that invasion success is not related to any single trait, but rather reflects different traits operating at different stages of the invasion process from introduction to establishment (Marchetti et al., 2004).”
Biological invasions: recommendations for U.S. policy and management. (2006, background): “Environmental matching is also possible for aquatic environments (Drake and Bossenbroek 2004, Marchetti et al. 2004a), but currently less tractable than for terrestrial habitats because: (1) fewer aquatic physicochemical data are available in appropriate electronic formats, and fewer distribution…”
Impacts of non-native fishes on Iberian freshwater ichthyofauna: current knowledge and gaps (2010, background): “…Peninsula does not have as many successful non-native fishes (N = 22) as other similar sized regions of the globe such as California (N = 49, Marchetti et al. 2004) or Italy (N = 39, Bianco and Turin 2009), the number of high-impact fish invaders is positively correlated to the total number…”
The Invasive Species Challenge in Estuarine and Coastal Environments: Marrying Management and Science (2008, background): “Trait-based approaches are promising because previous invasion history elsewhere in the world is one of the most reliable ways to predict future problems (Hayes and Sliwa 2003; Kolar and Lodge 2002; Marchetti et al. 2004).”