Exploring agency beyond humans: the compatibility of Actor-Network Theory (ANT) and resilience thinking
By A. Dwiartama, C. Rosin. 2014
124 citations recorded by the source corpus.
At first glance, the compatibility of social theory and resilience thinking is not entirely evident, in part because the ontology of the former is rooted in social interactions among human beings rather than ecological process. Despite this difference, resilience thinking engages with particular aspects of social organization that have generated intense debates within social science, namely the role of humans as integral elements of social-ecological systems and the processes through which given social structures (including material relations) are either maintained or transformed. Among social theoretical approaches, Actor-Network Theory (ANT) is noted for its distinctive approach to these aspects. ANT proposes that human and nonhuman components (both referred to as actants) have the same capacity to influence the development of social-ecological systems (represented as actor-networks) by enacting relations and enrolling other actors. We explore the notion of agency that is employed in resilience thinking and ANT in order to extend our understandings of human-environment relationships through complementary insights from each approach. The discussion is illustrated by reference to ongoing assessment of resilience as it is experienced and expressed in two distinctive agricultural production systems: Indonesian rice and New Zealand kiwifruit. We conclude by establishing the potential for ANT to provide more profound theoretical conceptualizations of agency, both human and nonhuman, in analyses of social ecological systems.
Subfields: General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Global and Planetary Change, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/caf2a3f553a8c4716f3184932a1359b1ee0cddc3
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In General Agricultural and Biological Sciences
In Global and Planetary Change
Citations in the corpus
- Alternative food networks as “market agencements”: Exploring their multiple hybridities (2016, background): “These fish played a role in the form taken by the market agencement that was established, even though they did so unwittingly (see also Dwiartama and Rosin, 2014).”
- A relational turn for sustainability science? Relational thinking, leverage points and transformations (2020, background): “…connected-ness from ‘deep’ relational perspectives that collapse distinctions between ‘human’ and ‘natural’ entities, for instance in relation to farms and farmers (Darnhofer et al. 2016; Darnhofer 2020) and agricultural systems more generally (Dwiartama and Rosin 2014; Darnhofer et al. 2019).”