Disability Discourses for Online Identities

By Natilene I. Bowker, Keith Tuffin. 2002

140 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Education, Public Administration, Safety Research

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/caab3aa155aec1a5b925f3c28cc4bbce840060ad

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Education

1. Victoria L. Henderson

In Safety Research

1. J. Davidson

Citations in the corpus

• ‘Coming out’ on the spectrum: autism, identity and disclosure (2010, background): “Existing research on disability and disclosure establishes the importance of critical discourse analysis in examining ‘the kinds of strategies used to challenge and resist oppressive subjective experiences’ (Bowker and Tuffin 2002: 331–332; see also Fairclough 1995).”
• Sexual Harassment on the Internet (2005, unknown): “…process refers to a variety of groups, among them women (e.g., Döring, 2000; Harcourt, 1999, 2000), children (e.g., D’Alessandro & Dosa, 2001), the old (e.g., McMellon & Schiffman, 2002), ethnic minorities (Matei & Ball-Rokeach, 2002), and people who are disabled (Bowker & Tuffin, 2002).”