Avoiding bio‐perversity from carbon sequestration solutions
By David B. Lindenmayer, K. Hulvey, Richard J. Hobbs, Mark Colyvan, A. Felton, Hugh P. Possingham, Will Steffen, K. Wilson, Kara N. Youngentob, Phillip B. Gibbons. 2012
132 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Global and Planetary Change
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ca79d216853a48511ac32e0d48939321b86e80c5
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
In Global and Planetary Change
Citations in the corpus
- Trade-offs, co-benefits and safeguards: Current debates on the breadth of REDD+. (2012, background): “Other research and analyses have argued that design aspects that influence the extent to which REDD+ could deliver biodiversity co-benefits and avoid ‘bio-perversities’ (negative biodiversity outcomes) [29], include the scope of REDD+, which influences the number of participating countries; the appl”