School Performance and Housing Values: Using Non-Contiguous District and Incorporation Boundaries to Identify School Effects

By D. Weimer, M. Wolkoff. National tax journal, 2001

149 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ca2756c63a4cc5b513c1848741d40198bb91e542

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. C. Hilber
2. C. Mayer
3. Eric A. Hanushek
4. Ludger Woessmann
5. Todd Schoellman
6. Steven G. Rivkin
7. Trung V. Vu
8. F. Cingano

In Sociology and Political Science

1. C. Hilber
2. Eric A. Hanushek
3. Ludger Woessmann
4. Steven G. Rivkin
5. Todd Schoellman
6. Trung V. Vu
7. Ludger Wößmann
8. Nikos Benos

Citations in the corpus

• Publicly Provided Education (2002, background): “Similarly, Weimer and Wolkoff (2001) confirm such within district capitalization of school performance.”
• Why do households without children support local public schools? Linking house price capitalization to school spending (2002, background): “2 See Barrow and Rouse (2004), Black (1999), Bogart and Cromwell (1997, 2000), Cheshire and Sheppard (2004), Dee (2000), Figlio and Lucas (2004), Reback (2005), and Weimer and Wolkoff (2001).”