The Future of Urban Research: Non-Market Interactions

By Edward L. Glaeser. 2000

131 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ca08aa7ca694fd469bccba0134b7f2c390e591ab

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

Citations in the corpus

Quality of Life in the Economic and Urban Economic Literature (2007, background): “As already mentioned, the main purpose of the studies presented so far is to either discuss the future of cities as agglomerations in space (Glaeser, 1999; Glaeser et al., 2001) or to examine the determinants of urban growth (Graves, 1976; Cheshire and Magrini, 2006).”
Product diversity, taste heterogeneity, and geographic distribution of economic activities: market vs. non-market interactions ✩ (2003, background): “Glaeser [7], Glaeser and Scheinkman [11,12], and Manski [24] made compre surveys including empirical analysis.”
INEQUALITY IN CITIES (2009, unknown): “Others suggest that the wealthy develop empathy for the poor through spatial proximity (Glaeser, 2000).”
Macroeconomics and housing: a review of the literature (2004, background): “49 Second, how will housing market performance and the housing-macro finance system and capital markets change in the 48 Among others, see Glaeser (2000), Glaeser and Gyourko (2001), Glaeser and Kahn (2003), Glaeser and Scheinkman (2003), Ioannides and Zabel (2000), and Ioannides (2003).”
Do Public Transport Improvements Increase Agglomeration Economies? A Review of Literature and an Agenda for Research (2011, background): “While Glaeser (2000) argued that transport costs are now minuscule in comparison to historical costs, and thus locating near markets has become less important, Puga (1998) showed that the agglomeration equilibrium is even more centralized under the assumption of decreased transportation costs, which”