Acoustic covariants of length contrast in Japanese stops

By Kaori Idemaru, Susan G. Guion. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 2008

115 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Signal Processing

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c9bc4c20904f563fdb4a6966c2d4ccb4aef213e7

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

1. Janet F. Werker

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. Janet F. Werker
2. H. H. Yeung
3. David J. Lewkowicz
4. Ferran Pons
5. Patricia K. Kuhl
6. Takao K. Hensch
7. Kai Olav Ellefsen

Citations in the corpus

• When does native language input affect phonetic perception? The precocious case of lexical tone (2013, background): “…may be because voicing distinctions can have as many as 16 co-varying acoustic cues (e.g., Lisker, 1986), while (consonant) duration distinctions have as little as 4 such cues (Idemaru & Guion, 2008; Kawahara, 2006), and the presence of extra cues may increase the perceptual salience of voicing.”