METHODS FOR ASSESSING THE COMPOSITION AND DIVERSITY OF SOIL MICROBIAL COMMUNITIES

By G. Hill, N. Mitkowski, Laura Aldrich‐Wolfe, L. R. Emele, D. Jurkonie, A. Ficke, Sandra L. Maldonado-Ramírez, S. Lynch, E. Nelson. 2000

526 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Molecular Biology, Soil Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c9b268b5ca81bdcdbef28b6ba376aad88d32412d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

In Molecular Biology

In Soil Science

Citations in the corpus

Functional and molecular responses of soil microbial communities under differing soil management practices (2004, background): “In recent years, the approaches for studying soil microbiota have moved from biochemical and microbiological determinations such as enzyme activities, microbial biomass and respiration coefficients towards the investigation of bacterial diversity and microbial communities structure (Hill et al., 200”
Microbial Community Structure and Diversity as Indicators for Evaluating Soil Quality (2010, background): “These are: (1) as individuals; (2) at population levels (Hill et al. 2000); (3) at the functional group level, including autotrophic nitrification (Stenberg et al.”
Microbial diversity in soil: selection microbial populations by plant and soil type and implications for disease suppressiveness. (2004, methodology): “A polyphasic approach, using culture-based and culture-independent methods, is likely to produce more complete information on the composition of soil microbial communities (53, 69) (Figure 1).”
DNA Extraction from Soils: Old Bias for New Microbial Diversity Analysis Methods (2001, background): “In the past decade, applications of new molecular biology methods based primarily on amplification of soil-extracted nucleic acids have provided a pertinent alternative to classical culturebased microbiological methods, providing unique insight into the composition, richness, and structure of microb”
Soil biology for resilient, healthy soil (2015, unknown): “Techniques for soil microbial ecology analysis (Hill et al. 2000; Hirsch et al. 2010; Rincon-Florez et al. 2013).”
Plant Growth Promoting Bacteria: Biodiversity and Multifunctional Attributes for Sustainable Agriculture (2017, background): “Root colonizing bacteria that exert beneficial effect on plant development via direct or indirect mechanisms have been defined as plant growth promoting bacteria [7-10].”
Response and interaction of Bradyrhizobium japonicum and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in the soybean rhizosphere (2018, background): “The rhizospheric microbiota, a zone of influence of plant roots on the soil microbiota is the most dynamic environment of plant-soilmicrobe interaction, where microorganisms, plant roots, and soil constituents interact (Hill et al. 2000; Bandyopadhyay et al. 2017).”
Using FAME profiles for the characterization of animal wastes and vermicomposts (2006, background): “Fatty acid 20:4o6 is ARTICLE IN PRESS M. Lores et al. / Soil Biology & Biochemistry 38 (2006) 2993–29962996 a characteristic protozoan biomarker (Hill et al., 2000) and its increase in all vermicomposts may be due to an activation and proliferation of protozoa caused by the oxygenation of the…”
Moss-dominated biocrusts increase soil microbial abundance and community diversity and improve soil fertility in semi-arid climates on the Loess Plateau of China (2017, background): “In addition, the determination of microbial community diversity in biocrusts by conventional techniques requires specialized skills, is time consuming, and is very poor in repeatability and accuracy (Hill et al., 2000; Redfield et al., 2002).”
Assessing bacterial diversity in soil (2008, background): “Nevertheless, only 0.1–1% of soil bacteria are accessible by these approaches ( Hill et al. 2000 ), which make the wide phylogenetic diversity remaining sparsely studied (Kaiser et al. 2001; Smit et al. 2001).”
Current overview on the study of bacteria in the rhizosphere by modern molecular techniques: a mini‒review (2015, background): “During the last few decades, a wide variety of molecular techniques have been developed and used as valuable tools for the study of diversity and function of bacteria in the rhizosphere (Hill et al., 2000).”
Review and re-analysis of domain-specific 16S primers. (2003, methodology): “PCR has been used to great effect to identify organisms that are as yet unculturable in vitro (e.g.,Hill et al., 2000; Polz and Cavanaugh, 1998; Theron and Cloete, 2000; Ward et al., 1990).”
Do tree-based intercropping systems increase the diversity and stability of soil microbial communities? (2009, background): “…more robust than Bartlett’s test for homogeneity of variance in the case of a Sources: Fostegård and Bååth, 1996; Sundh et al., 1997; Zelles, 1999; Hill et al., 2000; Madan et al., 2002; Diaz-Ravina et al., 2006; Balser et al., 2005; Hamel et al., 2006; Rinnan et al., 2007. departure from…”