Long term measurements of radiation belts by SAMPEX and their variations

182 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Dst model for 1995–2002 (2006, methodology): “…very predictable system for the large-scale currents that influence Dst. [30] We are using our Dst model to make near real-time predictions of the Dst index (and also the daily averaged >2 MeV electron flux at geosynchronous orbit [Li et al., 2001b; Li, 2004]) based on data from the ACE satellite.”
Helium, Oxygen, Proton, and Electron (HOPE) Mass Spectrometer for the Radiation Belt Storm Probes Mission (2013, methodology): “Li et al. (2001) used SAMPEX data to produce a dramatic illustration correlating the inner edge of the outer electron belt with the location of the plasmapause.”
The global atmospheric electric circuit and its effects on cloud microphysics (2008, methodology): “…electrons precipitating from the quasitrapped radiation belts in the magnetosphere can dominate over that due to GCR. Measurements of the flux at orbital altitudes, which determines the precipitating flux, with data on its variability in time and latitude have been made by Li et al (2001a, 2001b).”
Energetic electrons, 50 keV to 6 MeV, at geosynchronous orbit: Their responses to solar wind variations (2005, background): “[23] On average, variations of radiation belt electrons are closely associated with geomagnetic storms, or the Dst index [e.g., Li et al., 2001b, Figure 1].”