Dst model for 1995–2002

By M. Temerin, Xinlin Li. 2006

165 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Atmospheric Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a801fd274cc47dfb618402fba9b8956b2528e2aa

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

1. P. Newell
2. J. Gjerloev
3. Xinlin Li
4. W. Dietrich
5. E. Cliver
6. D. N. Baker
7. M. L. Mays
8. A. Pulkkinen

In Atmospheric Science

1. J. Gjerloev
2. P. Newell
3. W. Dietrich
4. E. Cliver
5. D. N. Baker

Citations in the corpus

• The 1859 space weather event revisited: limits of extreme activity (2013, methodology): “…model of Temerin & Li (2002) used in Figure 5 has been proven successful in reproducing measured Dst from solar wind data for large magnetic storms (Temerin & Li 2006) and also for inferring solar wind parameters across coverage gaps in satellite data from geomagnetic observations (Cliver et al.…”
• SuperMAG‐based partial ring current indices (2012, background): “[2] Dst is often regarded as the geomagnetic index having the clearest physical interpretation [Dessler and Parker, 1959; Skopke, 1966], while also being the easiest to predict purely from solar wind observations [Burton et al., 1975; Temerin and Li, 2006].”
• A nearly universal solar wind-magnetosphere coupling function inferred from 10 magnetospheric state variables (2007, background): “These are ETL = n 1/2 v 2 BTsin 6 (θc/2) [Temerin and Li, 2006], ESR [Scurry and Russell, 1991, and EWV = v 4/3 BTsin 4 (θc/2)p 1/6 .”
• A major solar eruptive event in July 2012: Defining extreme space weather scenarios (2013, background): “89, respectively, a good validation [Temerin and Li, 2006].”