Urban containment policies and housing prices: an international comparison with implications for future research

By Casey J. Dawkins, A. Nelson. 2002

197 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Population–Urbanization–Energy Nexus: A Review (2019, background): “However, the effectiveness of these containment strategies around the world is mixed because of differences in the willpower of policymakers, and geographic and institutional contexts [55]—for example, fuel taxes, an empirically and theoretically proven tool to induce more compact urban form and pre”
Future urban land expansion and implications for global croplands (2016, background): “However, the effectiveness of urban containment strategies around the world is mixed, and its success depends on many factors, including the willpower of policy makers, and geographic and institutional contexts (52).”
The Effects of Land-Use Regulation on the Price of Housing: What Do We Know? What Can We Learn? (2005, unknown): “• Development right purchase/transfer.”
Urban Containment Policies and the Protection of Natural Areas: The Case of Seoul's Greenbelt (2006, background): “…study on the effect of urban containment policies on housing prices concluded that urban containment programs do affect land prices, but that the “demand side of the housing market may be a stronger determinant of prices than local urban containment policies” (Dawkins and Nelson 2002:1).”