Validity and Reliability
By Petr Mariel, David Hoyos, Jürgen Meyerhoff, Mikoaj Czajkowski, T. Dekker, K. Glenk, Jette Bredahl Jacobsen, Ulf Liebe, Søren Bøye Olsen, Julian Sagebiel and 1 more. Environmental Valuation with Discrete Choice Experiments, 2008
996 citations recorded by the source corpus.
This chapter concerns different aspects of validity and reliability of a discrete choice experiment. Firstly, it focuses on three essential concepts for assessing the validity of the welfare estimates obtained in the choice experiment, namely content, construct and criterion validity. Secondly, it discusses how the reliability of the recorded choices can be assessed. It then discusses issues related to model comparison and selection. Finally, it addresses prediction in discrete choice models as a way to assess the quality of a model.
Subfields: Management Science and Operations Research, Statistics and Probability
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c98098fc29702e89db255bd73a724b1045bdc607
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Management Science and Operations Research
In Statistics and Probability
Citations in the corpus
- The Visual Analogue Scale for Rating, Ranking and Paired-Comparison (VAS-RRP): A new technique for psychological measurement (2018, background): “Besides, both Ferrando (2003) and Scherpenzeel and Saris (1997) suggested that the number of response categories used by respondents depended on many factors, such as the type of scale, and respondents’ motivational and cognitive characteristics.”