Markets in environmental governance — From theory to practice

By A. Vatn. 2014

132 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Global and Planetary Change, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c97817233fb608ab63a855f4faaa994bf0bcf2db

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. Bram Büscher
2. R. Fletcher
3. R. Muradian
4. E. Gómez‐Baggethun
5. J. Dempsey
6. Daniel Suarez
7. E. Corbera
8. Sven Wunder

In Global and Planetary Change

1. R. Fletcher
2. Bram Büscher
3. R. Muradian
4. E. Gómez‐Baggethun
5. J. Dempsey
6. Daniel Suarez
7. E. Corbera
8. Sven Wunder

In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

1. R. Fletcher
2. Bram Büscher
3. E. Gómez‐Baggethun
4. R. Muradian
5. J. Dempsey
6. Daniel Suarez

Citations in the corpus

• The PES Conceit: Revisiting the Relationship between Payments for Environmental Services and Neoliberal Conservation (2017, background): “In a similar spirit, Vatn (2015) creates his own 6-part typology depicted in the following diagram (See Table 1).”
• Arrested Development? The Promises and Paradoxes of “Selling Nature to Save It” (2016, background): “, what counts as for-profit) and challenges assembling and obtaining comprehensive data (Vatn 2014).”
• In markets we trust? Setting the boundaries of Market-Based Instruments in ecosystem services governance (2015, background): “As noted by Vatn (2015), what protects the environment in any economic instrument including a market mechanism is not the trade element but the element of command that defines the liability or politically-set environmental target.”