Use and abuse of fishery models
By J. Schnute, L. Richards. 2001
146 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c977dea3b66c54b377716b3357daecbca47c40f1
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology
In Global and Planetary Change
- J. Kitchell
- Carl J Walters
- T. Essington
- C. Needle
- S. Martell
- Isaac C. Kaplan
- Villy Christensen
- S. Cox
In Nature and Landscape Conservation
Citations in the corpus
- Recruitment models: diagnosis and prognosis (2001, background): “Reflecting this view, Schnute and Richards (2001) recently coined the term “fishmetic” to denote the uncertainty inherent in the conversion of the usual laws of arithmetic into fishery models.”
- End-To-End Models for the Analysis of Marine Ecosystems: Challenges, Issues, and Next Steps (2010, unknown): “…the complex life cycles and longevity of HTL organisms have always presented an enormous challenge to skill assessment for fish population models (Schnute and Richards 2001), especially when those models provide the foundation for fisheries stock assessment and management decisions (Hilborn and…”
- Reconstructing ecosystem dynamics in the central Pacific Ocean, 1952-1998. I. Estimating population biomass and recruitment of tunas and billfishes (2002, background): “, logistic model r, K) remain constant over time (Walters et al. 2000; Schnute and Richards 2001).”
- Food‐dependent individual growth and population dynamics in fishes* (2006, background): “Rather, most fish population models are typically age or stage based assuming a fixed age–size relationship ( Schnute & Richards, 2001; Shepherd & Pope, 2002).”