End-To-End Models for the Analysis of Marine Ecosystems: Challenges, Issues, and Next Steps

By Kenneth A. Rose, J. Allen, Y. Artioli, M. Barangé, J. Blackford, F. Carlotti, R. Cropp, U. Daewel, K. Edwards, Kevin J. Flynn and 16 more. 2010

260 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Abstract There is growing interest in models of marine ecosystems that deal with the effects of climate change through the higher trophic levels. Such end-to-end models combine physicochemical oceanographic descriptors and organisms ranging from microbes to higher-trophic-level (HTL) organisms, including humans, in a single modeling framework. The demand for such approaches arises from the need for quantitative tools for ecosystem-based management, particularly models that can deal with bottom-up and top-down controls that operate simultaneously and vary in time and space and that are capable of handling the multiple impacts expected under climate change. End-to-end models are now feasible because of improvements in the component submodels and the availability of sufficient computing power. We discuss nine issues related to the development of end-to-end models. These issues relate to formulation of the zooplankton submodel, melding of multiple temporal and spatial scales, acclimation and adaptation, behavioral movement, software and technology, model coupling, skill assessment, and interdisciplinary challenges. We urge restraint in using end-to-end models in a true forecasting mode until we know more about their performance. End-to-end models will challenge the available data and our ability to analyze and interpret complicated models that generate complex behavior. End-to-end modeling is in its early developmental stages and thus presents an opportunity to establish an open-access, community-based approach supported by a suite of true interdisciplinary efforts.

Subfields: Ecology, Global and Planetary Change, Oceanography

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/01255260c5576b186b1bad3c03a3ddedd350cf3d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

  1. Kevin J. Flynn
  2. Elizabeth A. Fulton
  3. A. Calbet
  4. Aditee Mitra
  5. Miranda C. Jones
  6. Anthony D. M. Smith
  7. Marc Hufnagl
  8. M. Peck

In Global and Planetary Change

  1. Elizabeth A. Fulton
  2. Aditee Mitra
  3. M. Peck
  4. A. Calbet
  5. Kevin J. Flynn
  6. Marc Hufnagl
  7. J. Pinnegar
  8. J. Thorson

In Oceanography

  1. Aditee Mitra
  2. A. Calbet
  3. Kevin J. Flynn
  4. E. Møller
  5. M. Peck
  6. Miranda C. Jones
  7. Marc Hufnagl
  8. T. Nielsen

Citations in the corpus