Cosmic structure as the quantum interference of a coherent dark wave

By Hsi-Yu Schive, Tzihong Chiueh, T. Broadhurst. Nature Physics, 2014

804 citations recorded by the source corpus.

A cosmological model treating dark matter as a coherent quantum wave agrees well with conventional dark-matter theory on an astronomical scale. But on smaller scales, the quantum nature of wave-like dark matter can explain dark-matter cores that are observed in dwarf galaxies, which standard theory cannot. The conventional cold-particle interpretation of dark matter (known as ‘cold dark matter’, or CDM) still lacks laboratory support and struggles with the basic properties of common dwarf galaxies, which have surprisingly uniform central masses and shallow density profiles1,2,3,4,5. In contrast, galaxies predicted by CDM extend to much lower masses, with steeper, singular profiles6,7,8,9. This tension motivates cold, wavelike dark matter (ψDM) composed of a non-relativistic Bose–Einstein condensate, so the uncertainty principle counters gravity below a Jeans scale10,11,12. Here we achieve cosmological simulations of this quantum state at unprecedentedly high resolution capable of resolving dwarf galaxies, with only one free parameter, mB, the boson mass. We demonstrate the large-scale structure is indistinguishable from CDM, as desired, but differs radically inside galaxies where quantum interference forms solitonic cores surrounded by extended haloes of fluctuating density granules. These results allow us to determine eV using stellar phase-space distributions in dwarf spheroidal galaxies. Denser, more massive solitons are predicted for Milky Way sized galaxies, providing a substantial seed to help explain early spheroid formation. The onset of galaxy formation is substantially delayed relative to CDM, appearing at redshift z ≲ 13 in our simulations.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c9574b6f3a33c09750870dd2f95e6488a32354ae

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. Volker Springel
  2. L. Hernquist
  3. Andrey V. Kravtsov
  4. P. Hopkins
  5. Jeremiah P. Ostriker
  6. Simon D. M. White
  7. M. Vogelsberger
  8. James S. Bullock

In Nuclear and High Energy Physics

  1. S. Vagnozzi
  2. N. Palanque-Delabrouille
  3. C. Yéche
  4. D. Marsh
  5. Jeremiah P. Ostriker
  6. Julien Baur
  7. E. di Valentino
  8. A. Peter

Citations in the corpus