Constraining the mass of light bosonic dark matter using SDSS Lyman-α forest

By Eric Armengaud, N. Palanque-Delabrouille, C. Yéche, D. Marsh, Julien Baur. 2017

251 citations recorded by the source corpus.

If a significant fraction of the dark matter in the Universe is made of an ultra-light scalar field, named fuzzy dark matter (FDM) with a mass of the order of 10^−22 − 10^−21 eV, then its de Broglie wavelength is large enough to impact the physics of large-scale structure formation. In particular, the associated cut-off in the linear matter power spectrum modifies the structure of the intergalactic medium (IGM) at the scales probed by the Lyman-α forest of distant quasars. We study this effect by making use of dedicated cosmological simulations which take into account the hydrodynamics of the IGM. We explore heuristically the amplitude of quantum pressure for the FDM masses considered here and conclude that quantum effects should not modify significantly the non-linear evolution of matter density at the scales relevant to the measured Lyman-α flux power, and for m_a ≳ 10^ − 22 eV. We derive a scaling law between m_a and the mass of the well-studied thermal warm dark matter model that is best adapted to the Lyman-α forest data, and differs significantly from the one inferred by a simple linear extrapolation. By comparing FDM simulations with the Lyman-α flux power spectra determined from the BOSS survey, and marginalizing over relevant nuisance parameters, we exclude FDM masses in the range 10^ − 22 ≲ m_a < 2.3 × 10^ − 21 eV at 95  per cent CL. Adding higher resolution Lyman-α spectra extends the exclusion range up to 2.9 × 10^−21 eV. This provides a significant constraint on FDM models tailored to solve the ‘small-scale problems’ of ΛCDM.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/35f6d5f9a9c1dbd4bf37ec21d3656a96950d0516

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. D. Schneider
  2. Andrey V. Kravtsov
  3. Daniel J. Eisenstein
  4. Volker Springel
  5. S. Vagnozzi
  6. M. Zaldarriaga
  7. Simon D. M. White
  8. Risa Wechsler

In Nuclear and High Energy Physics

  1. S. Vagnozzi
  2. Julien Lesgourgues
  3. N. Palanque-Delabrouille
  4. C. Yéche
  5. B. Jain
  6. D. Schneider
  7. David N. Spergel
  8. Risa Wechsler

Citations in the corpus