A Vision of Responsible Research and Innovation

By René von Schomberg. 2013

958 citations recorded by the source corpus.

This paper outlines a vision of responsible research and innovation and develops an implementation strategy for it.

Subfields: Management of Technology and Innovation, Management Science and Operations Research

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c952679a1dd23051d6fcb5274f443f4b4ee6584c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management of Technology and Innovation

In Management Science and Operations Research

Citations in the corpus

Innovating Innovation Policy: The emergence of ‘Responsible Research and Innovation’ (2015, background): “…context of emergent or unproven technologies such as nanotechnology, synthetic biology and 14 For good overviews see Stirling (2006), Felt and Wynne (2007) and te Kulve and Rip (2011) more generally, and Stahl (2012), Owen et al. (2013) and von Schomberg (2013) on RRI specifically in this context.”
Innovation Systems for Transformations towards Sustainability? Taking the Normative Dimension Seriously (2017, neutral): “, [36,218]) and aims to achieve (ethically) acceptable, sustainable, and societally desirable outcomes of innovation processes and their marketable products [15,37].”
Education for AI, not AI for Education: The Role of Education and Ethics in National AI Policy Strategies (2021, background): “In response, for example, Singapore proposes a nine-month AI Apprenticeship Programme, Lithuania its first ever Master’s program in artificial intelligence (Ministry of the Economy and Innovation 2019), and Mexico its Wizeline AI Academy, including tuition-free coursework and integrated mentorship (”
Innovation policy: What, why, and how (2017, background): “…as anticipation, participation, deliberation, transparency—to ensure that the process and direction of R&D and innovation better take into account societal preferences and concerns around ethics, sustainability, etc. (Hellström, 2003; Owen et al. , 2012; Stilgoe et al. , 2013; Von Schomberg, 2013).”
The Emerging Concept of Responsible Innovation. Three Reasons Why It Is Questionable and Calls for a Radical Transformation of the Concept of Innovation (2015, background): “Another assumption in responsible innovation is that innovations are inherently good, as they produce prosperity and jobs and meet societal challenges at the same time (von Schomberg 2013).”
The evolving state-of-the-art in technology transfer research: Revisiting the contingent effectiveness model (2015, background): “For example, von Schomberg (2013) anchored responsible innovation within the ethical promotion of social justice, sustainable development, and socially desirable quality of life.”
New directions for RIS studies and policies in the face of grand societal challenges (2021, background): “The literature on responsible research and innovation (RRI) incorporates norms and values in the innovation process and moves societally desirable innovation outcomes centre stage (Owen et al., 2012; Stilgoe et al., 2013; Von Schomberg, 2013).”
Stakeholder engagement for responsible innovation in the private sector: critical issues and management practices (2015, background): “As a collective endeavour, all actors involved in the innovation process share responsibility and are co-responsible (Owen et al., 2013; Von Schomberg, 2013).”