Spatial incentives to coordinate contiguous habitat

By G. Parkhurst, Jason F. Shogren. 2007

246 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Global and Planetary Change, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c9133281c99e67738c93aa352603ae74ff8b2297

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Global and Planetary Change

In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Citations in the corpus

Early adoption of conservation agriculture practices: Understanding partial compliance in programs with multiple adoption decisions (2018, background): “The particular incentive mechanism under investigation in this larger study is the agglomeration payment incentive scheme (Parkhurst et al., 2002; Parkhurst and Shogren, 2007, 2008; Drechsler et al., 2010; Watzold and Drechsler, 2014).”
Integrating Ecology and Economics in the Study of Ecosystem Services: Some Lessons Learned (2009, background): “Recent papers have investigated improving conservation solutions by making payments to landowners a function of decisions of all landowners in a neighborhood (e.g., Parkhurst et al. 2002, Parkhurst & Shogren 2007).”
Economic Factors Affecting Diversified Farming Systems (2013, background): “Despite a number of papers that make the theoretical case for programs such as " cooperation bonus " programs that take this into account (Parkhurst et al. 2002, Shogren et al. 2003, Parkhurst and Shogren 2007), they are largely absent in practice.”
The Impact of Land-Use Change on Ecosystem Services, Biodiversity and Returns to Landowners: A Case Study in the State of Minnesota (2011, background): “Finding policy mechanisms that provide incentives to independent landowners so that they choose an efficient spatial pattern is an on-going area of research (e.g., Parkhurst et al. 2002; Parkhurst and Shogren 2007).”
The efficiency of voluntary incentive policies for preventing biodiversity loss (2009, background): “Several papers have investigated making payments to landowners a function of decisions of neighboring landowners (e.g., Smith and Shogren 2002, Parkhurst et al. 2002, Parkhurst and Shogren 2007).”
The Devil in the Detail: A Practical Guide on Designing Payments for Environmental Services (2016, background): “The other main approach to spatial coordination is the agglomeration bonus (Parkhurst and Shogren, 2007; Parkhurst et al., 2002).”
The Impact of Information Provision on Agglomeration Bonus Performance: An Experimental Study on Local Networks (2014, unknown): “This specification of the payoff function is similar to the one implemented by Parkhurst et al. (2002) and Parkhurst and Shogren (2007) where landowners’ payoffs depend upon the management option and the number of participating neighbors choosing that same action.”
Adapting auctions for the provision of ecosystem services at the landscape scale (2011, background): “A series of studies by Parkhurst, Shogren and others investigate the use of a ‘smart subsidy’, which is a fixed payment with an agglomeration bonus, to provide an incentive for neighbouring landholders to coordinate their bids (Parkhurst et al., 2002; Parkhurst and Shogren, 2005, 2007).”