Evaluation of Dimensionality in the Assessment of Internal Consistency Reliability: Coefficient Alpha and Omega Coefficients

By S. Green, Yanyun Yang. 2015

190 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Computer Networks and Communications, Management Science and Operations Research, Statistics and Probability

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c90f74a91f2a46a582de9a6287925d0172bc713a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Computer Networks and Communications

1. Ítalo Trizano-Hermosilla
2. Eunseong Cho
3. Jesús M. Alvarado

In Management Science and Operations Research

1. Ítalo Trizano-Hermosilla
2. Eunseong Cho
3. Jesús M. Alvarado
4. David B. Flora

In Statistics and Probability

1. Ítalo Trizano-Hermosilla
2. Eunseong Cho
3. Jesús M. Alvarado
4. David B. Flora

Citations in the corpus

• Making Reliability Reliable (2016, methodology): “Previous studies are increasingly using omega as a general name for various SEM-based reliability coefficients (Brunner et al., 2012; Cho & Kim, 2015; Dunn et al., 2013; Green & Yang, 2015; Lucke, 2005; Padilla & Divers, 2013; Revelle & Zinbarg, 2009).”
• Best Alternatives to Cronbach's Alpha Reliability in Realistic Conditions: Congeneric and Asymmetrical Measurements (2016, background): “This would make it necessary to carry out further research to evaluate the functioning of the various reliability coefficients with more complex multidimensional structures (Reise, 2012; Green and Yang, 2015) and in the presence of ordinal and/or categorical data in which non-compliance with the ass”