Tooth microwear pattern in roe deer (Capreolus capreolus L.) from Chizé (Western France) and relation to food composition

By G. Merceron, L. Viriot, C. Blondel. 2004

84 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c8f0a4347740ecac24e5c0543474030d94154115

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. J. Scott
2. P. Ungar
3. G. Merceron
4. R. Scott
5. F. Rivals
6. C. Blondel
7. L. Viriot
8. L. Bonis

Citations in the corpus

• Microwear evidence for Plio–Pleistocene bovid diets from Makapansgat Limeworks Cave, South Africa (2006, methodology): “…pits separated the extant taxa into dietary categories with browsers having a higher percentage of pits than grazers and mixed feeders overlapping in their pit percentage with either grazers or browsers (e.g., Solounias and Hayek, 1993; Solounias and Semprebon, 2002; Merceron et al., 2004a,b) (Fig.”
• Dental Microwear Texture Analysis of Varswater Bovids and Early Pliocene Paleoenvironments of Langebaanweg, Western Cape Province, South Africa (2007, methodology): “Other techniques combining low-magnification light microscopy (Merceron et al. 2004a, b) or white light confocal microscopy (Merceron and Ungar 2005; Schubert et al. 2006) with semiautomated image analysis have also been effective in distinguishing extant grazing and browsing ungulates.”
• The Late Miocene paleoenvironment of Afghanistan as inferred from dental microwear in artiodactyls (2004, unknown): “…lunatus), 13 sable antelope (Hippotragus niger), 8 Burchell’s zebra (Equus burchelli), and 6 Przewalski’s horse (Equus przewalskii) (Vesey-Fitzgerald, 1969; Stewart and Stewart, 1970; Grobler, 1974; Sinclair, 1977; Hoffman, 1989; Estes, 1991; Murray, 1993; Kingdon, 1997; Blake, 2002; King, 2002).”
• Dental microwear texture analysis of extant African Bovidae (2012, methodology): “…in the literature (e.g., Vrba 1980, 1985 , Wing et al. 1992 , Bobe and Eck 2001) and their fossils are frequently used to infer the ecological context of a site (e.g., Gentry 1970 , Solounias and Dawson -Saunders 1988 , Merceron et al. 2004a, 2005 , Merceron and Ungar 2005 , Ungar et al. 2007 ).”
• A New Method of Dental Microwear Analysis: Application to Extant Primates and Ouranopithecus macedoniensis (Late Miocene of Greece) (2005, methodology): “The magnification was increased up to 120 times for treatment on the computer monitor (Merceron et al., 2004a, b).”
• Dental microwear of fossil bovids from northern Greece: paleoenvironmental conditions in the eastern Mediterranean during the Messinian (2005, methodology): “Thus, as in previous studies (Ungar, 1996; King et al., 1999; Merceron et al., 2004a,b), we include the data from both mandibular and maxillary molars in a single sample.”
• A COMPARISON OF THE DIETARY HABITS OF A LARGE SAMPLE OF THE PLEISTOCENE PRONGHORN STOCKOCEROS ONUSROSAGRIS FROM THE PAPAGO SPRINGS CAVE IN ARIZONA TO THE MODERN ANTILOCAPRA AMERICANA (2006, background): “…modern and fossil samples were under somewhat different immediate ecological conditions at their times of death (either browsing or grazing), seasonality of death might also be a factor influencing microwear results on modern (Mer- ceron et al., 2004) or fossil samples (Rivals and Deniaux, 2005).”