A COMPARISON OF THE DIETARY HABITS OF A LARGE SAMPLE OF THE PLEISTOCENE PRONGHORN STOCKOCEROS ONUSROSAGRIS FROM THE PAPAGO SPRINGS CAVE IN ARIZONA TO THE MODERN ANTILOCAPRA AMERICANA

90 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Mammalian dental function and wear: A review (2015, unknown): “At the same time, studies expanded to include teeth from other parts of the mouth [145,146], and many other mammalian taxa, from antelopes to zebras [147 – 149], bats to moles [150,151], pigs to sheep [152,153], marsupials to large cats [154,155], and several more.”
Dietary flexibility and niche partitioning of large herbivores through the Pleistocene of Britain (2016, background): “Over the past decade, integrated studies of microwear and mesowear have been undertaken for the inference of paleodiets (Rivals and Semprebon, 2006; Rivals et al., 2007a).”
Hypsodonty and tooth facet development in relation to diet and habitat in herbivorous ungulates: implications for understanding tooth wear (2013, background): “…between feeding types, and, more recently, several researchers have developed approaches to convert the mesowear signal into a single continuous variable (Mihlbachler & Solounias 2006, Rivals & Semprebon 2006, Semprebon & Rivals 2007, Kaiser et al. 2009), which is termed the mesowear score (MS).”