A Stage Model of Behavioral Therapies Research: Getting Started and Moving on From Stage I
By B. Rounsaville, K. Carroll, Lisa Onken. 2006
867 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Developmental and Educational Psychology, General Health Professions
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c8e2d0bfcf0ee1cc9c53551fcd55e40e901f222b
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Clinical Psychology
In Developmental and Educational Psychology
In General Health Professions
Citations in the corpus
- Linking prevention science and social and emotional learning: The Oregon Resiliency Project (2009, background): “Describing this stage research notion, Rounsaville, Carroll, and Onken (2001) noted the difficult research demands placed on developers of new clinical innovations: “The progressively rigorous methodological requirements of conducting clinical trials of behavioral treatments has placed a large…”
- Acceptance, Mindfulness, and Science (2006, methodology): “This problem is the reason that the federal government has begun to prime the pump by funding treatment development, or so called stage 1 research ( Rounsaville et al., 2001 ).”
- The dynamic sustainability framework: addressing the paradox of sustainment amid ongoing change (2013, background): “Efficacy trials are designed to screen out noise in the system (patient comorbidities, competing demands and skill variance of clinicians, resource limitations, varying motivations of patients) [7], and thus maximize outcomes.”