Selecting Studies and Collecting Data
By Julian P. T. Higgins, J. Deeks. 2008
539 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Statistics and Probability
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c8b851f24e9616bb8470739b58d55f04cae3f3d9
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Statistics and Probability
- J. Polanin
- Terri D. Pigott
- Dorothy Espelage
- C. Lonsdale
- Michael Noetel
- Joseph Ciarrochi
- Jennifer K Grotpeter
- Brooke Van Zanden
Citations in the corpus
- Mindfulness and acceptance approaches to sporting performance enhancement: a systematic review (2017, methodology): “Where an intervention was conducted, we extracted the study design, intervention content, intervention dose, and details about comparison group, as recommended in Higgins and Deeks (2008).”
- Methodological Guidance Paper: High-Quality Meta-Analysis in a Systematic Review (2019, background): “Major guidelines for systematic review and metaanalysis all require the practice of double-screening (Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, 2009; Higgins & Deeks, 2011; Institute of Medicine, 2011; Methods Group of the Campbell Collaboration, 2016).”
- Best practice guidelines for abstract screening large‐evidence systematic reviews and meta‐analyses (2019, methodology): “The Cochrane Handbook provides a typical process for selecting studies that includes a two‐step process for examining titles and abstracts and then full texts.(8) Guidelines from the Center for Reviews and Dissemination,(9) the US Institute of Medicine,(10) and the Agency for Healthcare Research and”