The Third Way and Its Critics

By A. Giddens. 2000

1,201 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c88f25cf6777135c656af7998f96e618be56eb32

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Sociology and Political Science

1. J. Furlong
2. J. Hudson
3. H. Haugh
4. Ka Ho Mok
5. Stefan Kühner
6. M. Kitson
7. R. Deem
8. K. Rubenson

Citations in the corpus

• Social capital and sustainable development: Theories and concepts (2005, neutral): “Like financial capital, social capital can be expanded — invested and reinvested” (Giddens, 2000:78).”
• Caught in an evaluatory trap: a dilemma for public services under NPFM (2001, background): “…the state, to make them ‘quicker on their feet’, benchmarking public service organizations against the best in the private sector and giving more autonomy down the organizational hierarchies (see Giddens, 2000: 58–9) – but governments have supposedly been trying to do this for a number of years.”
• The Third Way and the Third Sector: New Labour's Economic Policy and the Social Economy (2007, background): “At the same time, Labour’s review of the fundamental philosophy of state ownership of industry was made explicit in The Third Way ( Giddens, 1998, 2000 ) and New Labour moved away from the view that the only alternative to private ownership was state ownership, which had been seen as a prerequisite ”
• Towards productive welfare? A comparative analysis of 23 OECD countries (2009, background): “Holden (2003), for instance, has argued that the increasingly widespread adoption of ‘workfare’ type policies represents a form of ‘administrative recommodification’ in which the state uses social policy interventions to enhance economic competitiveness and support the market.”
• Similar Trends, Diverse Agendas: Higher education reforms in East Asia (2003, background): “No matter how we assess positive or negative impacts of globalisation (Ratinoff, 1995; Ekong & Cloete, 1997), it is undeniable that modern states are not entirely immune from the prominent global forces (Held et al., 1999; Giddens, 2000).”
• Globalisation, New Managerialism, Academic Capitalism and Entrepreneurialism in Universities: Is the local dimension still important? (2001, background): “…and social welfare has a high priority as means of addressing inequities) and neo-liberalism (where the market replaces the state as the main mechanism of distributing goods and services, and social welfare is reduced to a safety net) as the predominant political discourse (Giddens, 1998, 2000).”
• Globalisation, Neoliberalism, and the Reform of Teacher Education in England (2013, background): “There has to be a newly defi ned role for an active state, which must continue to pursue social programmes” (Giddens, 2000, p. 7, emphasis added).”
• The Nordic model of Lifelong Learning (2006, background): “The stress on individual responsibility can be seen to reflect the Third Way programme and its ethos that ‘the precept ‘‘no rights without responsibilities’’ applies to all individuals and groups’ (Giddens, 2000, p. 165).”