A future for carbon taxes

By A. Baranzini, J. Goldemberg, S. Speck. 2000

408 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c860c6a853677be9b121860030a815bdb460f545

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

Citations in the corpus

Effectiveness, earmarking and labeling: testing the acceptability of carbon taxes with survey data (2017, background): “A recent strand of literature has started exploring the public acceptability of carbon taxes, pointing to a series of important obstacles such as distributional impacts on low-income households and fear of competitiveness effects (cf. Baranzini et al. 2000; Zhang and Baranzini 2004).”
What do we know about carbon taxes? an inquiry into their impacts on competitiveness and distribution of income (2003, positive): “If not totally exempted, the revenues from environmental taxes are often fully recycled back to the affected industries, for example in the form of grants for energy saving investments and cuts in employers’ social security contributions (cf. Baranzini et al., 2000).”
Environmental tax reform: does it work? A survey of the empirical evidence (2000, background): “In addition, expositions of environmental taxes in European countries, some of which serve to finance ETR, can be found in EEA (1996), OECD (1997b,c, 1999), Baranzini et al. (2000) and especially European Commission (2000a).”
Environmental regulations an option: Asymmetry effect of environmental regulations on carbon emissions using non-linear ARDL (2018, background): “It is levied on fossil fuels and other relevant products such as natural gas, coal, and jet fuel, helping to reduce CO2 emissions and fossil fuel usage (Baranzini, Goldemberg, and Speck 2000; Lin and Li 2011).”
A Chinese Sky Trust? Distributional Impacts of Carbon charges and Revenue Recycling in China (2007, background): “Several European countries have introduced carbon charges, starting with Finland in 1990 and followed by Norway, Sweden, Denmark, the Netherlands, and Italy (Baranzini et al., 2000).”
Perceived fairness and public acceptability of carbon pricing: a review of the literature (2019, background): “A fourth explanation, illustrated by Baranzini et al. (2014), is that, despite being concerned about the regressive impacts of carbon pricing, some people did not consider redistributing revenue to low-income households a viable option due to its large administrative burden.”
Distributional effects of carbon taxation (2016, background): “technology [55,67,101] or an ear-marked fund to environmental programs [4], and/or ameliorate negative side effects by using the tax revenue to mitigate ‘‘fuel poverty” through funding retrofitting of houses [67] or transfer payments for low-income families [29,63].”
The welfare effects and the distributive impact of carbon taxation on Italian households (2005, background): “Scheraga and Leary (1992, quoted in Baranzini et al. (2000) footnote 6, p.”
The Public Acceptance of Green Taxes: 2 Million Voters Express Their Opinion (2004, neutral): “See also the surveys by Baranzini, Goldemberg, and Speck (2000) and OECD (2001).”
On the distributional impact of a carbon tax in developing countries: the case of Indonesia (2015, background): “Most of the studies on the distributional impact of a carbon tax are of developed countries, as is observed by Baranzini et al. (2000). Among the early works is that of Poterba (1991) who analyses the distributional effect or a carbon tax by examining the expenditure pattern of households, especiall”