Environmental tax reform: does it work? A survey of the empirical evidence

By B. Bosquet. 2000

374 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/04b59f5505453daa2592a7d33dea3d66a75b99ec

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

Citations in the corpus

Jobs and climate policy: Evidence from British Columbia's revenue-neutral carbon tax (2017, background): “10See Majocchi (1996) and Bosquet (2000) for a survey of empirical evidence.”
Exploring Carbon Pricing in Developing Countries: A Macroeconomic Analysis in Ethiopia (2019, background): “A shift of tax burden away from labor supply financed by carbon price can lead to a reduction of economically inefficient under-utilization of available workers (Anger, Böhringer, and Löschel, 2010; Bosquet, 2000; Markandya, 2012).”
Searching for Triple Dividends in South Africa: Fighting CO2 pollution and poverty while promoting growth (2006, background): “Bosquet (2000) surveys 56 different studies and concludes that when environmental tax revenues are used to reduce payroll taxes, small gains in employment are likely in the short and medium term.”
Policies for a more Dematerialized EU Economy. Theoretical Underpinnings, Political Context and Expected Feasibility (2016, background): “OECD (2004), Agnolucci (2011), Speck et al. (2011) find the effects on sectorial competitiveness to be negligible while Bosquet (2000), in the context of energy policies, finds quite opposite empirical evidence.”
Green fiscal reform in Sweden: Econometric assessment of the carbon and energy taxation scheme (2018, background): “They include research on environmental tax reforms in Europe in general ([29], [33], [34], [4], [41], [68], [69], [71], [23], [24], Bosquet, [19], [46]), UK [31,28], [22], [8], Germany [14], UK and Germany [5], Scan dinavia [2], [53], [70], [63], Sweden [50], [72], [75], [76], [77], Norway [55], Cze”
Working time reduction policy in a sustainable economy: criteria and options for its design. (2014, background): “Theoretical arguments, simulations, and actual experience in various European countries all suggest that Environmental Tax Reform has the potential to maintain state revenue even as tax revenue from labour reduces, additionally bringing environmental benefits (Bosquet, 2000; Patuelli et al., 2005).”
The economic and environmental impact of a carbon tax for Scotland: A computable general equilibrium analysis (2014, background): “7 SeeGoulder (1995), Bovenberg andGoulder (1996), Fulloerton andMetcalf (1998) for a clear account of the issues and Bosquet (2000) for a survey of the double dividend literature on environmental taxes.”
Environmental Taxes and Economic Growth:Evidence from Panel Causality Tests (2014, background): “This offers tentative support for other studies which find either little or ambiguous evidence of the environmental taxes affecting economic growth, as noted in Bosquet (2000) and Anger et al, (2010).”
Determinants of CO2 emissions in European Union countries: Does environmental regulation reduce environmental pollution? (2020, background): “This type of policy can bring both environmental and economic benefits, as revenues are used to decrease the distortion in taxation on labour and production, and, at the same time, help to decrease pollution (Bosquet, 2000).”
Empirical evidence on the effectiveness of environmental taxes (2012, background): “Most of the studies conclude that increased environmental tax and ETR can have beneficial effects on the environment (Bosquet, 2000).”