Contexts of Accommodation: Developments in Applied Sociolinguistics
2010
343 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Language and Linguistics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c808052e83f3a308edc623a2c05a01f9ba39ce74
Citations in the corpus
- The antecedents and consequences of human behavioral mimicry. (2013, positive): “In addition, people mimic verbal characteristics of interaction partners, including accents (Giles et al. 1991), linguistic style (Ireland & Pennebaker 2010, Niederhoffer & Pennebaker 2002), speech rate (Webb 1969), and syntax (Levelt & Kelter 1982).”
- Spoken fluency revisited (2010, positive): “research, psycholinguistics, sociolinguistics and computer-human-interface studies points to an understanding that human interlocutors fine-tune their speech and pausing rates in an attempt to converge with those of their interlocutor(s) (Street et al., 1983; Street and Capella, 1989; Giles et al., ”
- Echoes of power: language effects and power differences in social interaction (2011, neutral): “While Wikipedia discussions provide a large-scale dataset with rich meta-information, overall, high-status people and low-status people are collaborating to accomplish a task.”
- Language Style Matching as a Predictor of Social Dynamics in Small Groups (2010, positive): “This positive relationship between the LSM metric and group cohesiveness is consistent with previous findings on mimicry (Bernieri et al., 1988; Chartrand & Bargh, 1999; Giles et al., 1991).”
- Converging toward a common speech code: imitative and perceptuo-motor recalibration processes in speech production (2013, positive): “…(Estow et al., 2007; Sato and Yoshikawa, 2007) and, regarding speech, vocal intensity (Natale, 1975; Gentilucci and Bernardis, 2007), speech rate (Giles et al., 1991; Bosshardt et al., 1997), voice onset time (Flege, 1987; Flege and Eefting, 1987; Sancier and Fowler, 1997; Fowler et al., 2008),…”
- Specificity and abstractness of VOT imitation (2011, positive): “In fact, Goldinger (2000) and Goldinger and Azuma (2004) showed that the effect of imitation as well as lexical frequency and number of exposures were still present five days after the training sessions.”