Numerical simulation of gas bubbles behaviour using a three-dimensional volume of fluid method

By V. S. Annaland, Ng Niels Deen, J. Kuipers. 2005

416 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Biomedical Engineering, Computational Mechanics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c7f06d34ca495923fff1579b055dd39172be8168

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Biomedical Engineering

1. Stefan Turek
2. James J. Feng
3. Stéphane Popinet
4. Fushen Liu
5. Ronaldo I. Borja

In Computational Mechanics

1. S. Hysing
2. Dmitri Kuzmin
3. James J. Feng
4. Pengtao Yue
5. Chunfeng Zhou
6. Stefan Turek
7. Sashikumaar Ganesan
8. Lutz Tobiska

Citations in the corpus

• Phase-field simulations of interfacial dynamics in viscoelastic fluids using finite elements with adaptive meshing (2006, methodology): “The rise of gas bubbles has been simulated by a number of groups using finite-difference [41], level set [42], and VoF [43,44] methods.”
• Quantitative benchmark computations of two‐dimensional bubble dynamics (2009, methodology): “Numerous improved schemes and methods for numerically simulating mixtures of immiscible fluids undergoing complex topological changes are published every year (see, for example, References [1–11]), and thus it is perhaps somewhat surprising that no rigorous, that is quantitative, numerical benchmark”